Barrow in front of Sigmaringer restaurant: the accused gets away with it!

Barrow in front of Sigmaringer restaurant: the accused gets away with it!

In a dramatic incident that heated the minds in Sigmaringen, a 25-year-old had to answer to the district court. He was accused of brutally beating a 30-year-old in early February 2023 in front of a restaurant. But the truth is more complicated than it seems at first. Loud schwäbische.de To a surprising end of the procedure, since the evidence was not sufficient to support a conviction.

The accused, who celebrated Fasnet on this fateful evening, described that he was attacked by the 30-year-old. "I then brought him to the ground and then a bouncer took over," he said in court. But the testimony of the witnesses were contradictory and led to confusion. The 30-year-old himself could not remember the exact process and claimed that he did not know the accused. "I don't know the Lord," he said while pointing to the 25-year-old.

contradictory testimony

The confusion increased when a bouncer who had observed the incident reported that there was initially a dispute between several men. "Then he ran away and I wanted to de -escalate the situation," said the bouncer. But when the situation escalated, he saw the accused and the 30-year-old grabbed the collar and fell to the ground. The bouncer was certain that the uninvolved, who intervened, had nothing to do with the dispute.

Another witness brought even more confusion into the matter. He claimed that the 30-year-old took him in his sweat box at the counter, which caused him to give him a baking whistle. "Then someone ran past me and started him," said the witness. These contradictory statements meant that the judge finally stated: "You can't base this." Video recordings from the restaurant could also not provide any clear evidence.

The end of the procedure

The judge decided that the procedure was hired because the evidence was not sufficient to condemn the accused. "They said to the police that it was the accused," said the judge, but the witness could not be sure. "Yes, that can be," he replied. The court was forced to close the case, which meant an unexpected but relieving end for the 25-year-old.

This incident shows how quickly a celebration can become a violent discussion and how difficult it is to find the truth in a sea of ​​contradictory statements. The events in Sigmaringen raise questions that go beyond this individual incident and remind us of how important it is to clarify the facts before you judge, such as Om-Online reported.