Woman receives a warning after warning strike - the focus of the workers' rights

Woman receives a warning after warning strike - the focus of the workers' rights

have to be unsubscribed at work?

The question of whether employees have to deregister at work is of considerable importance in labor law and raises legal and practical aspects. A current case shows that the deregistration can be a controversial topic in the absence, especially if this is related to work. In a recent example, an employee took part in a nationwide warning strike of a union without informing her employer in advance. This led to an argument about the status of their absence.

The employer interpreted the lack of the employee as unexcused and gave her a warning. This procedure shows that employers often insist that employees will report their absences in good time in order to avoid possible misunderstandings and not to disturb the operating process. From the employer's point of view, deregistration is essential because it gives the opportunity to plan the personnel deployment accordingly.

On the other hand, the question arises as to what extent employees in Germany are obliged to participate in strikes and other work residues as part of their rights to participate in advance. The unions often argue that the workers should not be put under pressure in the exercise of their strike right to have to unsubscribe in advance. These different perspectives can lead to tensions between employers and employees, especially in times of trade union conflicts.

With regard to labor law, it is important that both employers and employees know the applicable regulations and tariff requirements. In many industries, it is common for a corresponding notification to be made in advance; However, specific contracts or collective agreements can provide different regulations.