Criticism of Dobrindt's border controls: Greens for rightful asylum protection

<p> <strong> Criticism of Dobrindt's border controls: Greens for rightful asylum protection </strong> </p>

Mihalic: Flat -rate rejections in violation of European law

The statement by Irene Mihalic, the first parliamentary managing director of the Greens faction in the Bundestag, to the planned tightening of border controls by Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) has triggered significant resonance. Mihalic described the desired ad hoc rejections of asylum applications at the borders as contrary to European law. In their opinion, such measures endanger the basic principles of cooperation with neighboring countries and could question the legal standards of the EU.

Mihalic emphasizes that a uniform and legally compliant asylum policy is crucial in order to maintain the rights of asylum seekers and at the same time to fulfill legal obligations. The criticism aims that flat -rate rejections are not only legally problematic, but can also undermine trust in international agreements. This trust is crucial for European integration and joint coping with migration.

In a broader context, the discussion about border controls and asylum policy deals with the challenges that arise from migration policy developments. Aspects such as humanitarian responsibility and the obligations of states play a central role under international law. Mihalic calls for a differentiated approach that takes into account both the protection of the external borders and the adherence of human rights.

The current debate shows that a balance between national security interests and international obligations is needed. Unreflected handling could not only lead to legal consequences, but also put a strain on the relationship with other EU countries. It is therefore essential that political decisions are carefully weighed and made in harmony with European standards.

The topic reflects the complex reality of migration policy in Europe, where questions of security, the rule of law and humanitarian obligations are in constant exchange. Mihalic's statements indicate that future political measures in this area require a critical examination in order to protect legal and moral standards.