Waldbröl: Shot process could end early for defendants

Veröffentlicht:

Von:

Waldbröler admits shot on his well -known

A 30-year-old defendant is at the center of a procedure at the Bonn district court, which deals with an incident of January 19 of last year in Waldbröl. The man is accused of shot into a friend, which led to a serious injury. The indictment accuses him of dangerous bodily harm and a violation of the weapons law.

According to the information, the incident occurred early in the morning in a parking lot, where the accused was involved in a dispute together with the later victim and other acquaintances. In the heated discussion, the accused pulled a weapon and gave several shots. First he is said to have shot on the floor before trying to hit the victim into his chest. When this failed and the victim could ward off the gun, a shot was released into the lower leg, which led to a serious bone injury.

Details of the incident

The defense lawyer admitted that the defendant was under the influence of drugs during the incident. However, the defendant himself stated that he was motivated by a call for help from a friend to the parking lot. During his testimony, he said that his initial intention was to settle the situation until he was tempted by the provocations of the victim, who asked him to shoot him.

The defendant's statement raises questions about the credibility of his confession, especially with regard to contradictory explanations. A witness who was also involved in the incident had rely on her right to refuse to testify, which further complicates the clarification of the exact circumstances.

legal consequences and possible discharge

The process already has serious legal consequences for the accused, who also has to answer in other legal proceedings. After the argument, he fled from Germany and stayed in Turkey and then in Georgia, where he was finally arrested on the basis of an international arrest warrant. Its time in detention could affect the judgment, since the conditions of detention there could enable a ratio of one to three.

As part of a possible deal, the accused could be released at the end of the month if he laid a “qualified confession”. However, this prospect raises numerous legal and moral questions regarding the responsibility and the severity of the crime.