Security risk in the White House: Waltz uses uncertain emails!
Security risk in the White House: Waltz uses uncertain emails!
On April 3, 2025, there are new developments related to Mike Waltz, the national security advisor of US President Donald Trump. According to a report by Süddeutsche , Waltz used Gmail for communication within the government instead of using encrypted email services. This decision accuses serious security concerns because Gmail is considered to be comparatively insecure, especially for sensitive government information.
A high -ranking employee of Waltz on the National Security Council (NSC) also used Gmail for votes with other government agencies. These communications concerned military positions and powerful weapons systems that play a role in an ongoing conflict. Waltz himself used his private Gmail account as part of his everyday work, but for information that is classified as less confidential.
security risks through email communication
The NSC spokesman said that there was no evidence that Waltz had used his private email for confidential purposes. But this matter is complicated by reports by bsi . E-mail systems are essential tools for organizations' ability to act, but are often exposed to attacks that aim to spy on information and endanger availability. Unwanted emails (spam) and malware represent considerable risks because they are spread via email and thus burden the security infrastructure.
The Berlin security authorities warn that attackers can take advantage of unsecured networks to read emails and thus endanger the integrity and confidentiality of messages. The BSI therefore offers measures and standards to guarantee the safe use of email, including encryption and digital signatures that play an important role in protecting sensitive information.
internal discussions and public support
In the current situation, Waltz publicly stated that he accidentally invited a journalist to a secret signal group that had to do with military use in Yemen. This journalist, Jeffrey Goldberg, released the chats, which also contains the situation. Despite the turbulence, Trump publicly stood behind the members of this chat group. Internally, however, he expressed concerns about Waltz's performance and is said to have wondered: "Should I fire him?"These events illustrate the complexity and the risks of dealing with sensitive information within the government. It remains to be seen how the situation will develop and what measures are ultimately taken to ensure national security.
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Washington, USA |
| Quellen | |