Influencer under fire: Process after New Year's Eve rocket in Berlin!

Influencer under fire: Process after New Year's Eve rocket in Berlin!

Berlin-Neukölln, Deutschland - On April 9, 2025, a 23-year-old influencer stands before the Berlin Regional Court. The process deals with an explosive incident from New Year's Eve when the defendant fired a fireworks rocket on an apartment in Berlin-Neukölln. The public prosecutor's office tried serious arson, tried dangerous bodily harm and property damage. The court plans to negotiate Plädoyers and a judgment after the trial has lasted several days today.

The influencer was arrested at BER Airport on January 4, 2025 when he tried to leave Germany. Since then it has been in custody because there is a risk of escape. According to the indictment, the rocket was fired "on self -interest and complete ruthlessness" and landed in the apartment of an apartment building, a bed and the wallpaper being damaged. Fortunately, the apartment owner prevented the fire from attacking and there were no injuries.

Witness reports and video analyzes

In the trial of the negotiation, video sequences of the incident were shown. A witness described that black smoke was visible in the bedroom and that the fleece was thrown out of the window. The influencer regretted regret about the action and described it as an oversight. He had assumed that the rocket would rise to heaven and wanted to give his community joy on Instagram, not to act on purpose.

An Instagram video in which he apologized, achieved over 6 million views, but was later deleted. Apparently the accused was only a tourist in Berlin, which the public prosecutor could not dissuade from the serious indictment. In the process, the defense lawyer has so far showed no willingness to comment, and the accused himself is silent about the allegations.

legal implications for influencers

the question of the legal classification of influencers arises. A judgment of the Federal Court of Justice of September 9, 2021 deals with the injunctive relief if the commercial purposes are noticed. Influencers are viewed as companies if they use their presence to market products or services. Advertising revenues are to be regarded as business actions and the assessment of your contributions is occasionally applied to criteria of press -like articles. The question of whether the commercial purpose is obvious is increasingly critically viewed by the courts, especially when advertising and personal experiences merge.

The process continues on April 7, with a total of four days of negotiations are planned by April 16. The public's attention remains directed towards further developments in this case.

For current information about the process, the reporting of Merkur and rbb24 essential. In addition, legal framework conditions and their effects for influencers in the analysis of dejure.org of meaning.