Netzer is silent in the summer fairy tale process: where is the truth?

Günter Netzer testified im Sommermärchen-Prozess über die WM 2006 Affäre, während Untersuchungen gegen ehemalige DFB-Präsidenten fortschreiten.
Günter Netzer Testified in the summer fairy tale process about the 2006 World Cup affair, while investigations against former DFB presidents are progressing. (Symbolbild/NAGW)

Netzer is silent in the summer fairy tale process: where is the truth?

In the current summer fairy tale process, Günter Netzer testified as a witness to the Frankfurt Regional Court. He mostly confirmed well -known details about the affair about the 2006 World Cup. However, the statements by Netzer did not contribute to clarifying the complex facts, which revolved around a questionable loan of CHF 10 million, which Franz Beckenbauer had received in 2002. This loan was forwarded to an account by Mohamed bin Hammam, a member of the FIFA Executive Committee in Qatar. Interestingly, Netzer only found out about this process in 2003. In his statement, he repeated that there were no talks with Theo Zwanziger, Wolfgang Niersbach or Horst R. Schmidt about the background.

Netzer also explained that Robert Louis-Dreyfus, who had conveyed the loan to Beckenbauer, asked him to push for a repayment of the loan at the DFB, which he also did. However, this repayment of the loan was not the only problem with which the DFB was faced with. At the center of the investigation is a payment of 6.7 million euros to FIFA from April 2005, which is regarded as inadmissible tax evasion, since the DFB declared this sum a year later as an operating edition.

Litigation and money requirements

The legal disputes not only affect the sums and loans mentioned, but also the prominent DFB representatives. For example, the proceedings against Theo Zwanziger were terminated without judgment due to the severe tax evasion, under the requirement to pay 10,000 euros to a charity. Twenties expressed relieved about the decision. Similarly, the case against Wolfgang Niersbach was terminated in September 2024 after he had reached an agreement with a payment of 25,000 euros. Horst R. Schmidt, on the other hand, agreed on a payment of 65,000 euros for the procedural setting.

All three accused rejected the allegations, but the legal difficulties for the DFB remain. The public prosecutor has rejected the general employment of the procedure against the DFB. In fact, the DFB is faced with the challenge of paying a threatening repayment of around 22 million euros, which has become due after the loss of non -profit welfare in connection with the 2006 World Cup.

outlook on the process

The negotiation against the DFB continues and the judgment is expected on June 25th. The presiding judge Eva-Marie Distler described the transfer payment of 6.7 million euros to FIFA as a "bribe payment", which is supposed to serve to secure a subsidy for the World Cup organization. In this context, the legal dispute over the DFB and its responsible persons seem to gain intensity. The public focus is on the upcoming court days and the possible consequences for German football.

For more information about the FIFA scandal and the associated details, you can visit Spiegel.de The developments related to the DFB show the far -reaching implications of financial transactions and their legal consequences in sport.

Details
OrtFrankfurt, Deutschland
Quellen