Data protection scandal in the youth welfare office: victims fight for justice!

Data protection scandal in the youth welfare office: victims fight for justice!

In the youth welfare office of the city of Schmallenberg, alarming incidents related to data protection and child protection have occurred. According to a report by Lokalkompass.de , internal police reports were passed on by the family court at the Meschede district court to uninvolved third parties. This happened, although the responsible judge K. violated the blocking notice in accordance with §51 of the Federal Registration Act. This incident raises serious concerns about data protection.

The victim protection office of the district police authority Meschede has confirmed that the publication of these reports was inadmissible. In the documents, a woman is clearly identified as a victim of domestic violence and threats by her violent ex -partner. This information arouses the concern of concern whether the youth welfare office in Schmallenberg should have taken responsibility to protect the woman and her children.

domestic violence and inadequate protection

The discussion about the duties of the youth welfare office becomes more intensive if you look at the experiences of affected women in the Hochsauerlandkreis. Another frightening example is the story of a woman from Schmallenberg, which her ex -partner poured with boiling water. Despite the serious allegations against the violence, which has already been convicted, he received sole custody, while the mother was denied how to deal with her child for almost two years.

After a separation or divorce, there is a good behavior for parents in German law. Nevertheless, the question remains how effectively this bid is implemented in practice. The incident throws a bad light on the work of the youth welfare offices in the Hochsauerlandkreis, whose trustworthiness is highly questioned in public according to reports.

support for those affected

The affected woman from Schmallenberg receives support from several family protection associations, including family protection Leana e.V. from Osnabrück. The chairwoman of this association reported serious threats that she received from the ex -partner's lawyer. Such attacks on supporters and lawyers illustrate the tense situation for women who are in an environment of domestic violence.

Another concern for worrying is that several women in the Hochsauerlandkreis have had similar experiences at the Meschede district court. This suggests that systemic problems and possibly inadequate protective mechanisms for victims of domestic violence are available.

Inquiries for a clarifying pronunciation to Mayor Burkhard König and District Administrator Dr. Karl Schneider were rejected in writing. A request for comment for this article remained just as unanswered.

The topic around the youth welfare office in Schmallenberg and the lack of consideration of victim protection could have far -reaching consequences for the affected women and families. In an open society, it should not be accepted that the rights of victims are ignored to this extent.

Such incidents must be processed to ensure that sacrificial decisions will be made in the future. The protection of endangered women and children should have a top priority in the work of the youth welfare offices and the courts.