Scandal on the migration advisory board: bullying and power struggle in Munich!

Scandal on the migration advisory board: bullying and power struggle in Munich!

In the Munich Migration Advisory Board, internal conflicts currently prevailed through bullying and mobbing. This is reported by the tz . The situation escalated when Tatiana Mendonça resigned her office as spokeswoman for the committee for residence and immigration law, racism, discrimination and refugee policy. Mandelão describes the working conditions as intolerable and speaks of systematic bullying. Nima Lirawi from the CSU also takes a position and reports on an improper tone that resulted in personal insults, including an advertisement against a member of the Greens.

In order to defuse the conflicts, a mediation was initiated. The advisory board chairman Dimitrina Lang sees various causes of the tensions, including party -political interference. Since 2023, the migration advisory board has included a names that, in addition to 40 elected members, also includes 10 persons sent by the city council. Long criticized that migrants are not trusted to represent their matters themselves. For the new election in March 2026, a return to the direct election of all advisory board members is required, which is supported by the administration in a current draft resolution.

political participation and the role of the migration advisory boards

The Munich Migration Advisory Board is part of a system that is supposed to secure the political participation of migrants. In Germany, around 6.83 million third -country nationals, stateless people and people with unexplained nationality live, which can often only take part in political decisions, such as bpb . While in 14 out of 27 EU countries, third-country nationals are allowed to take part in local elections, Germany sees restrictions here. In fact, the municipal voting right is of crucial importance for migrants, since many important decisions are made at this level. The exclusion of migrants without German citizenship is considered "democratic deficit".

The first foreigners in Germany were founded in the 1970s in order to take into account the growing needs of a plural society. However, these advisory boards have only one advisory function and are not equipped with decision -making skills, which further reinforces the stress of migrants in political participation. The political participation of migrants is particularly limited in East Germany, since there are fewer integration advisory boards.

demands for reforms and the way to political equality

The need to reform integration advisory boards is undisputed. The bpb lifts that there is a growing change in the right of basic state to enable. While migrants from EU countries can already vote for municipal, this is denied third-country nationals, which leads to further alienation from political participation. This is primarily questionable, since formal political participation is closely linked to integration and democratic will formation.

Although the conflicts within the Munich Migration Advisory Board make the current situation difficult, it remains essential that the parties think about the upcoming election procedures and the role of migrants in the political landscape. Lang emphasizes that despite the internal tensions, the advisory board remains capable of action and work, but some committees are affected by problems. The upcoming elections in March 2026 could be crucial for how migrants in Munich and beyond are heard in the future.