Criticism and malice: CDU chairman provokes with Klomännchen -Post

Criticism and malice: CDU chairman provokes with Klomännchen -Post

Another storm in the water glass: A post from Sulingen CDU city association chairman Stefan Meyer has caused a lot of discussion and outrage. He recently published a photo montage of the valuable, about 2,000 -year -old bronze figure, which was found during archaeological work on the area of the new clinic in Borwede. The representation that insults the ancient insulting into the light shows the figure on a toilet and with a newspaper in hand, on which there is in large letters: "Scheisszeitung. Borwede a shitty location." Meyer described the picture as private and assured that it was intended as a humorous reaction to the heated discussion about the site.

The creation of this polarization lies in the current location question for the central clinic, which has been the subject of numerous debates since 2020. Based on this, a specialist company had evaluated 17 criteria and found that Borwede is the most suitable location. With a fulfillment of the criteria of 73.1 percent, Borwede prevailed against Sulingen, which only reached 69.5 percent. Despite the implementation of the project that has already started, the criticism of the location remains lively.

background to search for location

The studies on the location selection are not out of air. Specialist planners had examined eight municipalities and 15 property offers in detail. A crucial criterion was the property price, which is why the then mayor of Sulingen, Dirk Rauschkolb, made a particularly attractive offer - only one euro per square meter. However, this measure, which was originally supposed to provide Sulingen, did not reflect in the result.

In the result, numerous Sulingen citizens gave their displeasure about Meyer's unfortunate posting on social media. While some were outraged by the slippery humor and the inappropriateness of the performance, others felt that Borwede was not the optimal location. Such a representation brings up the heated emotions in the city and symbolizes the disappointment about the decision of the location search.

reactions from the community

The reviews of Meyer varied considerably. The district craftsman Matthias Wendland searched for a more objective consideration of the situation and described Borwede as "catastrophic misjudgment of the district council". As drastically the reactions were, some citizens also saw a cynical humor in Meyer's post. It should be noted here that the distance between political responsibility and private humor is not always clearly defined.

The CDU district chairman Axel Knoerig also commented on the statements and made it clear that they should be regarded as a single opinion that is not supported by the district board. Meyer did not reflect the communication style for which the CDU stands.

like Uwe Lorenz, the managing director of the Diepholz Clinic Association, noted, the "levellessness" of the contribution testifies to a lack of a lack of decency that personalities in political offices should have. Critical voices require political representatives to have a role model function, especially in turbulent times when the exchange is heated and emotional.

A valuable find remains in the shadow

The bronze figure itself, a 2,000 -year -old relic that dates from the Roman Empire, would have to pay much more attention in public perception than the polemical alludes of an individual. It is important for the community to recognize and maintain the historical value of such finds. The determined location of the location quickly forgotten in the emotional debate about the selection of clinic, and the criticism of Borwede continues to bloom - but at the expense of an important chapter in local history.

Instead of appreciating the antiquity and respecting the associated finds, she is ridiculed in a private, careless post, which raises more questions than answers. The discussion about the clinic locations is certainly important, but it should not happen at the expense of the historical heritage of the region.

The discussion about the location of the new clinic in Borwede and the associated statements by Stefan Meyer also raise fundamental questions about the perception of political culture and municipal responsibility. Political satire has a long tradition in Germany, but it is important to observe the context and the effects of such representations on public opinion and living together in the respective location. Especially in the current time in which political tensions and populism increase, such a representation can be considered lightly and potentially harmful.

The Borwede location, as already mentioned, was selected on the basis of 17 criteria that should also ensure future health care for the population. The decision was the result of a thorough and objective analysis that aimed to determine the best place for a modern medical facility. These objective criteria, including accessibility and infrastructure, cannot be carefully questioned, in particular not by insinuing jokes or insulting postings.

Significance of municipal health care

The establishment of a new clinic is more than just a structural measure; It has far -reaching implications for medical care in the region. Hospitals play a central role in health care, especially in rural areas, where access to medical aid is often limited. The decision for the location is therefore not only a question of political discussion, but also affects every citizen directly, since the quality and availability of health services are crucial for the well -being of the population.

In the Diepholz region, access to specialists and emergency treatments is already a challenge. The new clinic is intended to close these gaps and enable a comprehensive medical care. This is also evident in the relevance of the choice of location for the future development of the health sector in the region. Negative statements or jokes about the location can lead to the citizens of losing confidence in political decision -making processes.

Political responsibility and public perception

The reactions to the controversial photo montage of Stefan Meyer and the subsequent discussion illustrate how important it is that political managers communicate with carefully. The public use of critical topics should always be respectful and factual. Negative statements about the press and local institutions can not only damage the reputation of those involved, but also endanger the community living together.

In the past there have been incidents in which landscape policy decisions were characterized by emotional discussions and personal attacks. This often led to an alienation between the politically responsible and the citizens. Politics faces the challenge of communicating transparently and responding to the concerns of the citizens. Constructive dialogues are required to combine the various interests and find solutions that meet the needs of the entire community.