Wrong reviews on the net: Employers fight against anonymity

Wrong reviews on the net: Employers fight against anonymity

assessment of employers on the Internet: opportunities and risks

In the age of digitization, employees are increasingly able to evaluate their employers online. This development has led to the development of evaluation portals such as Kununu, my boss, glass gate or job voting, which gain a variety of opinions and experiences. However, the possibility of anonymous evaluation also carries risks, especially if the criticism is based on false information.

Legal steps against fake reviews

A current judgment of the Hamburg Higher Regional Court shows that employers can defend themselves against unjustified negative ratings. These can request that the author's name be disclosed or the evaluation is deleted if there are doubts about their authenticity. Especially in the case of fake reviews, the anonymity must be lifted to enable the relationship between evaluators and companies.

A concrete example illustrates the problem: critical statements such as "empathy is a foreign word" or "outdated technology and poor working conditions" can significantly impair the image of a company. The OLG Hamburg therefore emphasizes the need to combat unjustified negative reviews to protect the reputation of companies.

insight into how Kununu

The Kununu evaluation portal is one of the best -known platforms on which employers can be assessed. In the event of doubts about the authenticity of an evaluation, companies from Kununu can request proof of belonging to the company's belonging to the company. Here, sensitive information from the evaluator is blackened in order to protect anonymity. Kununu emphasizes that it is consistent against fake reviews to create transparency on the labor market.

permissible criticism and responsibility

labor lawyers warn both employers and employees of rash or untrue statements in online reviews. While factual and constructive criticism is generally permitted, legal consequences in the event of false claims are threatened. Value judgments and personal experiences can be shared as long as they correspond to the truth and do not harm the reputation of the company.

The balance between freedom of expression and responsibility

The possibility of evaluating employers online on the one hand offers an important feedback source for companies, on the other hand, it requires responsible action on the part of the evaluators. The balance between freedom of expression and protection against calls for calls is therefore an important topic that is also discussed in legal disputes up to the highest court.

- Nag