Talks about confession: Sheikh Mohammed and 9/11-complaints in Guantánamo

Talks about confession: Sheikh Mohammed and 9/11-complaints in Guantánamo

Developments related to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 raise questions about justice and the American legal system again. In a surprising step, Calid Sheikh Mohammed and other co-accused allegedly aimed at an agreement with the US judiciary, which could contain a admission of guilt.

a profitable step for the judiciary?

The alleged main person responsible for the attacks, Chalid Sheikh Mohammed, has been sitting in the notorious US prison camp Guantánamo Bay for many years. He and two other accused have agreed to an agreement that could possibly prevent a punishment in the form of the death penalty, although the exact details of this agreement, as well as the further procedure, are still kept secret.

memorable memories of September 11th

The terrorist attacks that took place on September 11, 2001 demanded the life of around 3,000 people and left profound scars in American society. Islamist terrorists had kidnapped three passenger aircraft on this fateful day and controlled the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington. A fourth machine crashed into Pennsylvania.

The background of Guantánamo Bay

The Guantánamo Bay prison camp was founded after the 2001 attacks to capture supposed Islamist extremists, often without a proper process. Human rights organizations have been criticizing the conditions for years and calling for a closure of the site, which reported figures in the meantime, almost 800 prisoners were housed. Currently only a few prisoners are imprisoned there.

consequences of interrogation and the long way to justice

After his arrest in 2003 in Pakistan, Chalid Sheikh Mohammed was interrogated by the CIA, whereby he had happened to him, according to a report by the US Senate. The long trial against him and his co -accused has been postponed several times for years, which caused many controversy and criticism.

procedural hurdles and the way forward

The latest developments in the Scheich Mohammed case could be a turn, both for the judiciary and for the families concerned who hope for justice. The intended agreement raises questions about the responsibility and accountability in the context of the serious crimes and could potentially initiate the discussion about the future of Guantánamo and the American legal system in relation to terrorism.

The world looks forward to the next steps of the US government and the possible implications of this agreement for the families of the victims who have been waiting for answers for more than two decades.

- Nag