Theft accusation against 82-year-olds: Dispute for 2.61 euros chopped in Vellmar

Theft accusation against 82-year-olds: Dispute for 2.61 euros chopped in Vellmar

The incident in the Edeka market in Vellmar raises questions about fairness and the treatment of older people in retail. While the retailers are trying to protect themselves against theft, the case of the 82-year-old who is accused has triggered a discussion about adequate measures.

The situation of the 82-year-old

The senior who used to shop at the meat counter quickly realized that he did not need the chopped. In view of the high temperatures that prevailed that day, he feared that the meat will spoil on the half -hour way back. So he put it back on a shelf before leaving the supermarket after paying other articles. "I know that was a mistake," confessed the 82-year-old, who vehemently denies the accusation of theft.

handling of the business with the situation

The reaction of the business owner, Sven Möller, was strict. He immediately listed the incident as theft and asked for a processing fee of 200 euros. "I can't help that he steals," said Möller, adding that he was caught every thief. However, this high fee that the senior did not want to pay was criticized as disproportionately. Instead, he paid 52.61 euros - the price price plus a voluntary payment of 50 euros.

the legal aftermath

After receiving reminders and against the background of an impending lawsuit, the case was quickly brought to court, but immediately hired because the public prosecutor's office assumed a "unique case". The 82-year-old felt guilty about the supposed misconduct, but continued to change with a letter to the market operator.

View of the fashion of the penalties in retail

The incident illuminates a bigger problem in retail: handling shoplifting and the associated measures vary greatly. While a high penalty of 200 euros is required in the Edeka Möller, other retailers such as Marika Hofmann or the new purchase market have significantly lower fishing bonuses of 100 euros each, whereby a penalty payment is often dispensed with in the REWE market, since many thieves are minors.

social effects and discussion

The case of the 82-year-old not only triggered discussions about the amount of fines, but also about dealing with older citizens in society. The senior pointed out that he was not planning to excuse everything, but was also not a "thief". This problem addresses many people and raises awareness of dealing with older people in retail. The calls for more empathy and understanding in business become louder because the behavior of retailers is critically reflected in public.

outlook on the next stage

Since the dispute between the Edeka operator and the senior is to be clarified in front of the Vellmar arbitration office, it remains to be seen what decision this will result. The situation not only questions the specific legal framework, but also allows deeper insights into the relationship between customers and retailers. It is to be hoped that the case will lead to a reflection on the right balance between security in retail and respectful handling of older fellow citizens.