Acquittal in the process of fatal arson attack in asylum seeker home

Acquittal in the process of fatal arson attack in asylum seeker home

success of law: the accused acquitted from aid to a fatal arson attack

At the center of the current process in Saarlouis, the question of a tragic arson attack in a refugee home in 1991 was. The defense had succeeded in denying the psychological connection of the accused in the course of the procedure to the arson of the arson of 33 years ago.

The tragic death of the refugee Samuel Yeboah from Ghana at the time triggered dismay at the time. The defendant was convicted of crime, but the judgment is not yet final. The Federal Prosecutor argued that the accused's words had motivated the actual arsonist and this would justify the aid to the murder.

The decision of the court in Koblenz has far -reaching effects on the discussion about law and justice in Germany. On the one hand, the acquittal shows that the evidence can be difficult in old cases like this. On the other hand, the decision leaves a gap in the search for justice for the victim of the 1991.

It remains to be seen how the Attorney General in Saarland will react to the judgment. The indictment announced that the acquittal is against the acquittal. The possible effects of this decision go beyond the individual case and touch the basic questions of security and extremism in refugee accommodation.

The 1991 events also lead a light on the challenges that refugees in Germany face. The discussion about extremism and security in asylum accommodation is more current than ever. This process has strengthened the international interest in the problems in the German asylum system.

The judgment could also influence political discussions about the integration of refugees and dealing with extremism in Germany. The conclusion of the procedure marks a milestone, but the questions and challenges in connection with the 1991 fire will continue to employ German society.

- Nag