Protection of the Constitution in Cologne: Dispute over LGBTQ support!

Protection of the Constitution in Cologne: Dispute over LGBTQ support!

Köln, Deutschland - A political thunderstorm! Thomas Haldenwang, the highest head of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, recently caused a stir with his statements at the Queer-political human rights conference of the SPD parliamentary group in Cologne. There he presented the Federal Office as a "reliable partner" of the LGBTQ movement. With the "Pride Pride" flag on the lapel, he left no doubt and explained: "In the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, they have a reliable partner", so Of course magazine . This statement and the wearing of political symbols have sparked controversial discussions about the neutrality obligation in the public service.

The Federal Ministry of the Interior, in turn, does not seem to consider wearing such symbols to be subject to approval, which in turn made the criticism rise. Above all, AfD member of the Bundestag, Leif-Erik Holm, cleared his anger about it. He sharply criticized the protection of the constitution under Haldenwang's leadership and expressed his concern that the authority concentrated too much on "political correctness" and "right ghosts" instead of real dangers such as Islamists and anti -Semites.

political symbols and their effect

The rainbow flag - more than just a colorful strip on the lapel? Haldenwang sees it a "permanent commitment and promise" for freedom and diversity. However, such a commitment leaves many questions open: How neutral does an office have to be responsible for protecting the constitution? The wearing of political symbols in such positions remains controversial, and the debate about it is by no means over. State Secretary Mahmut Özdemir (SPD) only stated that there is no obligation to approved for such symbols, which hardly calms the heated minds.

criticism from a political camp

The allegations were not long in coming! Political opponents see Haldenwang's appearance as a smooth violation of the neutrality obligation. Holm even asked the Federal Government to bring Haldenwang to reason and to be responsible for what he sees as "misconduct". He emphasized that the protection of the constitution should not be maneuvered in an imbalance, the people -close and critical -thinking citizens flee, but must concentrate on essential security issues.

In the middle of this debate it is important to note that of course-magazine report that Haldenwang remains true to his line despite the criticism of his line. This appearance shows that the protection of the constitution under his leadership sets clear signs that cause both recognition and violent criticism - the weather remains in political Berlin