Wave of protest on Norderney: Kaiserhof is on the brink for fire protection!

The Kaiserhof on Norderney was largely closed by the district of Aurich, which has triggered a wave of protests. Only the ground floor with 117 residential units may continue to be used. So far, 50 contradictions have been received by the owners against the use of uses. Some owners have several apartments, which increases the number of contradictions. However, the opponents are obliged to justify their objections, which has not yet happened. The legal dispute could drag on, and in the event of rejection of the contradictions

The event for the closure was considerable fire protection defects that were found during a fire during renovation work at the swimming pool in March 2023. The fire brigade had documented smoky escape routes, open fire doors and a non -functioning smoke extraction. A far -reaching subsoil was immediately pronounced. Regular inspections from the construction supervision are not required by law for such apartment houses, and the district had no evidence of existing defects before the fire. Currently, no comparable fire protection defects in other apartment buildings or hotels were found on Norderney, such as [NWZ Online] (https://www.nwzonline.de/norden/protestwelle-auf-norderey- against-kaiserhofs- Regelmaessige-Brandschutzpruefung-he-weine-he-weine-kehrt-kein-he-kein-ke-

Legal framework of the use of uses

The subsequent subsequent is based on the public interest in effective fire protection, which in such cases regularly stands above the private interest of the owner. If the administrative act is obvious, the owner's interest in the restoration of the suspensive effect could outweigh, on the other hand, if the administrative act was obvious, as the building authority has determined, the enforcement interest prevails. This is relevant, since the lack of escape routes and concerns about the stability of a large garage in the event of a fire were found, as [right-wing glass] (https://www.rechtslupe.de/verwaltungsrecht/brandschutzlechtliche-Maengel-und---s-sortigen-der-U-U-Useller- 3109089) reports.

The building authority has already made it clear that some building permits have been granted, but no total planning is approved. It was also found that some of them were built without permission or in deviation from permits. The fire protection requirements specified in the building permits have not been fully implemented. In addition, there are no reliable evidence of the fulfillment of the fire protection requirements. The building authority called for the submission of existing plans and fire protection concepts to ensure the security of users. The arrangement of immediate enforcement is therefore justified to minimize fire hazards.