Shock judgment in Düsseldorf: Pensioner has to pay almost 8,000 euros for Facebook post!

Shock judgment in Düsseldorf: Pensioner has to pay almost 8,000 euros for Facebook post!

Düsseldorf, Deutschland - An incredible process-an story that is difficult to believe! Think of Doris G., a pensioner who worked hard to make ends meet with her 1,600 euros. But what happened? A Facebook comment, in which she breathed her displeasure with a quote from Federal Minister of Economics Robert Habeck, almost cost her freedom and ended with a juicy fine of 7,950 euros! On October 8, 2023, the 74-year-old Doris Sah had an article with Habeck's statement that Germany was dependent on immigration in order to cover the need for labor. This caused the barrel to overflow for her, she wrote a comment full of anger about the helpers of this policy.

the axis of the good reported that the public prosecutor's office Düsseldorf doris G. She was scared because she actually just wanted to express her opinion, not rush against a people. The courtroom of the district court in Düsseldorf was occupied for just 30 minutes. A short process seemed planned . Two prosecutors were deployed as if it were a case of terrorism! How could such a scandal come about?

between freedom of expression and judiciary

The accusation: Your comment on Facebook is suitable to endanger public peace and stir up hatred. Doris G. said to defend that she was upset against Habeck's quote, given so many unemployed people in the country. However, and she admitted that, the last sentence of her comment might have been a bit violent. But the entire procedure was apparent that it was more about her political opinion than about the crime itself. The young prosecutor made it clear that this was the sticking point of the indictment - apparently an attack on her personal right to express your opinion.

To make matters worse, Doris G. was already convicted in 2022 for "bad recovery against public life". To date, she pays her fine in small rates. The representatives of the public prosecutor now demanded 160 daily rates and argued that their remorse was mitigating, but their aggressive criticism is punishable. The defense countered that Doris G.'s comment was to be classified within freedom of expression, similar to how fifty percent of the political parties would do.

judgment with signal effect? ​​

Finally, judge Tobias Kampmann Doris G. sentenced to 150 daily rates. His reason was a balancing act between legitimate freedom of expression and punishable sedition. Thanks to such a rigorous approach, Doris G. could ultimately have to pay for more than 19 years! The judgment is not yet final and there is an appeal in the room. In any case, however, it ensures controversy and discussions about the limits of freedom of expression and its interpretation by the judiciary. Achgut Media explains the concerns of data protection and the rights of citizens in the context Procedure. The way in which the digital age deals with public opinion impressively shows how narrow the ridge between freedom of expression and the possible criminalization can be.