Rental dispute escalated: Police intervene in Prenzlauer Berg!

Rental dispute escalated: Police intervene in Prenzlauer Berg!

A dramatic incident in Prenzlauer Berg caused excitement on Friday evening. A 23-year-old woman was prevented from entering her apartment. Around 20 people blocked access, which caused the 23-year-old to alert the police. The background of this mission was a persistent rental dispute between the 23-year-old and a 38-year-old who stood in her apartment against the return of the younger woman. According to a judicial decision, however, the 23-year-old had the right to enter the apartment, such as Tagesspiegel.

The police operation began when the officers asked the group to release their way to the apartment. However, the blockade was not removed immediately. When the 38-year-old, against whom several legal disputes are already pending, aggressively turned against the officials and struck a police officer, the situation escalated. The police finally had to intervene and bring the woman to the ground to overwhelm her. The 38-year-old complained about pain during the argument and was taken to a hospital. Their aggressive reaction also led the police to demand cell phones from viewers who were filming the incident, and in a further incident a cell phone was even thrown away before an unknown person caught it.

Background of the rental dispute

rental disputes are a hot topic in many cities. In a similar case on the Mehringdamm in Kreuzberg, a tenancy was terminated due to alleged disruptions of the trouble, but the district court of Tempelhof-Kreuzberg dismissed the landlord's evacuation. The court found that repeated resting disorders and threats did not represent a sustainable disorder in the legal sense if they could not be demonstrated by the behavior of a tenant. In this case, the landlord had only submitted a police operation as proof that was caused by a mentally ill member of a tenant, which was not sufficient for a termination, so bmgev.

Similar legal principles are also used in other rental disputes, as a judgment of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) shows. The BGH decided that the mere disruption of a tenancy is not sufficient for termination without notice, and the tenant's behavior must also be demonstrated. In the context of noise pollution and other violations of the contract, it must be demonstrated that a tenant actively contributed to the disruption. If this proof is missing, the termination is declared inadmissible, which in a further tragic case of disputes between tenants was determined, how [Haufe] (https://www.haufe.de/recht/weitere-rechtsgeiete/miet-immobilienrecht/bgh- Fristlosene-kuendigung-des-mietSeses-bei-bie-be-bie-be-be-be-bei-bei-bei-be-bei-bei-bei-bei-bei

The incident in Prenzlauer Berg once again shows how tense tenancy can become and which extreme measures are taken. The police continue to investigate the exact background of the incident and to potential other legal steps that could be taken in the course of this rent.