Trump: Selenskyj is thinking about Creeper waiver! What happens now?
Trump: Selenskyj is thinking about Creeper waiver! What happens now?
Krim, Ukraine - President Donald Trump recently initiated speculation that the Ukrainian President Wolodymyr Selenskyj could possibly be willing to do without the controversial Crimea. This statement fell during a short meeting between the two heads of state in Rome, in which the topic of Crimea was discussed. Trump described the demand for a return of the peninsula to Ukraine as "ridiculous". Despite these statements, Selenskyj remains steadfast and rejects any waiver of the Crimea and other areas annexed by Russia.
Trump reported that Selenskyj had expressed his interest in further weapons, while the US President also asked Russia to stop attacks on Ukraine and negotiate a peace deal. This is done in a context in which talks about Ukrainian regional detections to Russia between Moscow and Washington take place, which is concerned with the international concern about the course of the conflict. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urges the two sides to get peace talks as quickly as possible and warn that the last steps are to be assessed as the most difficult.
war course and international dynamics
The conflict between Ukraine and Russia continues to accept dramatic features. Selenskyj accuses Russia of doing deception and reports on persistent attacks by the Russian army. The Ukrainian President calls on international pressure on Russia to end the war and explains that Ukraine is ready for unconditional ceasefire - a demand that also encounters resistance.
in parallel to the efforts to peace, North Korea has confirmed its first use of his own soldiers in the Ukraine War. These soldiers are said to have carried out operations for the “liberation of the Kursk” Operations under the command of Kim Jong Un. North Korea also continues to deliver ammunition and weapons to Russia, which further fueled the situation.
scientific analyzes on conflict dynamics
In the middle of this conflict, political scientists like Muamer Bećirović emphasize that the Ukraine war and the departure from the principle of equilibrium have weakened the United States in its global role. He argues that NATO expansion was a mistake that burdened the relationship with Russia. Herfried Münkler emphasizes that the US security policy was already fragile before Trump. This is particularly worrying because NATO boss Jens Stoltenberg expects a long confrontation with Russia and demands coordinated armaments investments.The opinions about the future direction of the conflict are shared. Experts warn that an armistice between Russia and Ukraine will not be permanent, and there is agreement that sustainable peace may only be reached after a change of regime in Russia. Nobel prize winner Scherbakowa sees negotiations with Putin as impossible, which urgency for Ukraine continues to receive military support.
The political landscape remains tense. Selenskyj's considerations on NATO membership in "Fast Track" mode illustrate the striving of Ukraine after closer connections to the West. The peace report “far from peace” shows that in the near future there is no peace in sight, which calls for the international community to intensify its support for Ukraine and to strengthen the requirements for Russia.
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Krim, Ukraine |
| Quellen | |