Dispute over the grandchild: when grandparents complain about the right of access

Dispute over the grandchild: when grandparents complain about the right of access

The argument between the spouses Aline and Benjamin Kauper from Wittenberg and the grandparents of their daughter raises significant questions about the right of access and the role of family courts. The legal disputes not only include personal conflicts, but also affect the profound influence on child development.

The background of the disputes

After the birth of her daughter, the Kaupers began to conflict with the parents of Benjamin. These were of the opinion that they had the right to regular contact with their grandchild and were looking for the opportunity to request this legally. Aline Kauper reports about an attacking behavior of the grandparents, who appeared and tried to question their educational decisions in their home without prior consultation.

Legal basics

The right of access of the grandparents in Germany has been legally anchored in Germany since the reform of childhood law in 1998. Although the possibility of suing such law is rarely used, it is relevant in specific situations such as separations or very divergent views between parents and grandparents. Christoph Pietzsch, a specialist lawyer for family law, emphasizes that the child's welfare has a top priority and that the court usually puts the well -being of the child in the foreground.

effects on the child

The frequent visits of the grandparents led to a change in behavior with their daughter, according to the Kauper. Instead of promoting the child, contact with uncertainty, expressed by crying and fearful behavior during overnight stays or visits to the grandparents. These developments alerted the parents, who are now also concerned about the psychological effects on their daughter.

emotional and financial burdens

The ongoing legal disputes not only burden the family emotionally, but also financially. Aline and Benjamin Kauper have to prove that contact with the grandparents is harmful to their daughter, which is associated with high costs for legal advice and possibly future regulatory funds. Aline Kauper explains: "Because of an illness and because I study, we already have big loans going and hardly any financial scope."

The role of the dishes

The circumstances that strangers decide on the right to deal with and childish education find the Kauper particularly stressful. Benjamin Kauper comments on the decision of the court, which maintains the comparison, without taking into account the fears and the well -being of the child. "It is robbed of the mind that instead of us as parents, strangers decide what happens to our child," he continues.

outlook and hope

The couple has now switched on the Naumburg Higher Regional Court, in the hope that the judges there will better consider the parental rights and the well-being of the child. They call for an assessment that takes their perspective as a parents more seriously by a child in a conflict of loyalty. The further developments are observed closely because they could have far -reaching implications for similar cases in the region and beyond.