Dispute over the best interests of the child: Wittenberg family in the court campaign

The vast majority of the comments In any case, incomprehension against the judicial decision that allowed the grandparents to have regular contact with their grandson. Another commentator summarizes: "Although you only know the view of the parents, but when you read the article, it is frightening how the court simply gets over the child's best interests." The concerns about the emotional consequences for the child are clearly addressed. Many users are concerned about the situation and emphasize that education is ultimately in the hands of the parents and not with their grandparents.

The emotional nightmare for the child

The commentators not only seem to consider the actions of the grandparents, but also the decision of the court to be problematic. One user writes: "This is a nightmare. For everyone, especially for the child. And yes, grandparents have to be able to let go." This statement focuses on the difficult position of the smaller ones, which is affected by the conflict. The parents seem to recognize that they have reached a point where the relationship with the grandparents is at risk.

In the discussion about the parents' approach, there are also critical voices. A commentator expresses that public walk to the media may be the last attempt by the parents to force understanding among the grandparents. This raises questions about how conflicts within the family can best be tackled and whether the escalation on social platforms is really the solution to such problems.

Overall, there is a clear trend in the comments: the users have great sympathy for those affected and show a clear tendency to stand up for the child's well -being. There is a widespread conviction that such family conflicts should be solved in a way that puts the well -being of the children in the foreground instead of involving them in a legal dispute.

The legal basis of the right of access

The right of access in Germany is anchored in the Civil Code (BGB), especially in §§ 1684 and 1671. It regulates the right of grandparents on contact with their grandchildren, even if the child's welfare is the focus. When making decisions about the right of access, a court must usually check whether the contact serves the child's well -being. This legal situation is intended to ensure that children can have a relationship with their grandparents as long as this is in the best interest of the child.

dishes can also take into account the interests of the parents, especially if they express concerns that relate to the child's well -being. In the current situation in Wittenberg, the court is confronted with the views of the parents and the rights of the grandparents.

The social perception of grandparents' rights

Public discussion and perception regarding grandparents is often ambivalent. On the one hand, there is a strong understanding of the role of grandparents in the life of grandchildren and the positive effects of these relationships, such as emotional support and family ties. Studies show that grandparents often act as important caregivers and have a positive impact on the development of their grandchildren.

On the other hand, there are also concerns that the defined right of access can lead to tensions within the families, as can be seen in the Kauper family. There is a growing demand for a balance between the rights of the grandparents and the parental authorities. Many commentators express the desire that parents and grandparents should find paths together to avoid conflicts and to promote the well -being of the child.

psychological effects on the child

The psychological aspects of forced contact law cannot be neglected. Studies show that children who are involved in conflict -rich family situations often suffer from emotional stress, which can lead to long -term development problems. Feelings of conflicts of loyalty between parents and grandparents can arise in children who may have the feeling that they should stand on one of the pages.