Durow criticizes outdated laws: Innovation vs. Personal liability
Durow criticizes outdated laws: Innovation vs. Personal liability
The founder of Telegram, Pavel Durow, pointed out the challenges and complexities in a recent post that are connected to the moderation and dealing with data protection at a global level. In a world in which social media play a central role in the life of people, it is crucial to find a balance between the different needs and expectations of the federal states.
Durow expressed sharp criticism of the current legal situation, the managers of technology companies often punish, based on laws that come from a time before smartphones and other modern means of communication have moved into everyday life. This practice, known as "miscalculated", could have an inhibiting effect, since no future -oriented person is willing to expose themselves to the dangers of legal consequences that could result from the possible abuse of their creations. Durow emphasizes that such conditions significantly impair the willingness to develop new technologies.
global moderation in the area of tension
In his explanation, Durow also put the challenge of Telegram's global management. The service strives to seek dialogue with governments, but at the same time is faced with the dilemma of protecting the privacy of its users. In authoritarian states, this principle is a significant hurdle. Durow emphasized that in such markets the protection of the user has priority - a clear indication of a possible restriction of business activities if the authorities of Telegram provide unexpected requirements."We are ready to leave the country," continued Durow, which is a clear positioning. In fact, in the past, Telegram has already left countries such as Russia and Iran after refusing to provide the necessary encryption codes that would have made a monitored use of the platform possible. Such decisions show that the company provides principles of profit, an approach that attracts both admiration and criticism in the tech world.
durows statements go beyond the short -term perspective and reflect the long -term effects of the current legal framework on innovative strength. The pressure of constantly being in harmony with various national security interests can prevent creative approaches to create new applications and services. This dynamic could inhibit the technological progress and endanger the competitiveness of companies in the digital landscape.
In summary, it can be said that Pavel Durow openly appeals to the current challenges of moderation and case law in the digital world and illustrates the delicate balance between freedom of innovation and legal framework. His company -owned principles that put privacy and data protection in the first place are a strong sign in the often complex landscape of social media and technological development.
Kommentare (0)