The focus on border controls: Greens warn of laws!

The focus on border controls: Greens warn of laws!

Aschaffenburg, Deutschland - The Federal Government has taken a new course in asylum policy with the announcement of increased border controls. Under the direction of the new Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU), a “factual freezing stop” for migrants without valid papers is sought. This was announced on the first day of Dobrindt, who was officially introduced to his office on May 6, 2025. Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) described these measures in response to a "new dimension of violence" in Germany, which is related to the latest incidents, including a fatal knife attack by an Afghan, who is subject to an exit.

Explanations such as that of Irene Mihalic, Parliamentary Managing Director of the Greens parliamentary group, criticize these plans sharply. She accuses Dobrindt of borrowing the civil servants at the national borders and describes flat -rate rejections of asylum seekers as contrary to European law. In their opinion, the rapid of the border controls could also lead to an overload of the federal police under pressure.

criticism of the new measures

Criticism on the new asylum policy goes beyond the Greens. Lars Castellucci, the SPD's domestic spokesman, also emphasizes that the controlled monitoring of 4,000 kilometers is not realistic. He supports the view that neighboring countries must consent to the process of rejections in order to prevent migrants from immersing and later entering Germany illegally. Castellucci warns that a violation of humanitarian principles threatens if migrants are rejected at the borders.

The Union has also formulated explosive demands that will be voted in the Bundestag next week. This includes permanent border controls, the rejection of all attempts from an illegal entry and detention for people who are obliged to leave. The Union also calls for the provision of vacant properties for detention and plans daily deportation. These strict measures are mainly assessed by the SPD and the Greens as constitutional and European law. Merz and his team, however, argue that national law has priority in extraordinary emergencies.

legal challenges and international concerns

The legal basis for the rejected rejection could be given by the Dublin III Ordinance, which regulates regulations on the responsibility for asylum procedures. However, the processing of inquiries to neighboring countries is more problematic than hoped for. Countries such as Luxembourg, Austria and Poland reject informal rejections. These legal and political hurdles raise questions about the smooth border traffic and the possibility of traffic jams and lead to considering potential legal disputes.

In the opinion of experts, there could be a legal dispute over the new measures, since people who are rejected at the German borders could legally act against their dismissions. In extreme cases, competent courts could switch on the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to clarify European law issues.

remains to be seen what the implementation of the new asylum policy will look like in practice. The dangers of overloading the security forces and the need for a clear, legally secure procedure are intensively discussed by the actors involved.

For the next few weeks, intensive debates are expected in the Bundestag, in which the different points of view and strategic approaches will be expressed. The Union demands support from other parties to implement their suggestions and counteract the AfD.

MDR reports that the upcoming decisions about the future of German migration policy not only touch measures, but also comprehensive social conflicts and legal issues that all touch Affect citizens.

Tagesschau describes the reactions from the political landscape that range from sharp criticism to supporting statements.

ZDF emphasizes how important an agreement is in the current situation.