Fight for upper water: Ukraine demands 150 Taurus missiles from Merz!

Fight for upper water: Ukraine demands 150 Taurus missiles from Merz!

Deutschland - The discussion about the delivery of Taurus marching aircraft to Ukraine has gained intensity. Andrij Melnyk, the former Ukrainian ambassador in Germany, calls for Friedrich Merz, the designated Chancellor, demands the rapid delivery of 150 of these high -precision weapons. Melnyk explained that Merz should announce the immediate delivery in the Bundestag on May 6, the day of his election as Chancellor. Merz has signaled his willingness to deliver, but emphasizes that this must be done in close coordination with European partners, which takes current geopolitical challenges into account. According to sueddeutsche.de could potentially classify Germany as a war party.

Russia warns clearly of the consequences of such a delivery. The government under President Vladimir Putin could interpret this as an act of interference in the conflict. Melnyk, on the other hand, considers immediate deployment to be crucial to increase the pressure on Ukraine and stop the advance of the Russian forces. He also demands that the upcoming black and red coalition also provide other military resources, around 30 percent of the available German fighter jets and helicopters, to support Ukraine.

geopolitical implications

The Taurus marching aircraft that have been in use since 2005 costs around one million euros each and have a range of up to 500 kilometers. Melnyk argues that Ukraine would benefit positively from these skills in order to attack goals behind the front lines of the Russian troops. At the same time, the USA of the ATACMS short -range missiles have provided the United States, while France and Great Britain provide marching missiles with a range of around 250 kilometers.

Olaf Scholz, the managing Chancellor, is skeptical about the immediate delivery of the Taurus marching aircraft. He fears that Germany could be drawn into the Ukraine conflict through such measures. This is also reflected in the broader international debate, which argues that the support of Ukraine is legitimized as a self-defense in accordance with the UN Charter, but the risk of being considered indirect. Experts indicate the gray area between military support and active participation in hostility, which makes it difficult for Germany to draw a clear line. swp explains that this is about the complex international law framework that is often not clearly defined.

diplomatic challenges

The current discussion also leads to questions about Germany's future role in international security architecture. The Federal Government tries to find a balance between the military support of Ukraine and the protection of diplomatic relationships. If the Taurus marching aircraft is actually delivered, this could strengthen Germany's position in European defense policy, but also results in potential risks to bilateral relationships with Russia. Melnyk calls for unconditional support from Ukraine, while Merz is concerned about diplomatic tensions, which illustrates the complexity of this decision.