Suche
Mein Konto
Drunk man in Neu-Ulm in front of the apartment door: police intervene!
A very drunk 60-year-old in Neu-Ulm cannot get into his apartment and is taken into police custody.
Drunk man in Neu-Ulm in front of the apartment door: police intervene!
On Saturday afternoon, concerned witnesses found a very drunk person in the stairwell on Vorwerkstrasse in Neu-Ulm. The police were called and the officers encountered a 60-year-old resident who apparently could no longer get into his apartment. The man, who did not have a key to his apartment, was in a desperate condition and refused to take a voluntary breath alcohol test. This was reported by the Augsburger Allgemeine.
Before the police arrived, the man had fallen several times in the stairwell, which underlined his helplessness. For this reason, officers decided to take him into protective custody to prevent further injuries. The 60-year-old was examined by a doctor as a precautionary measure, but did not require any medical intervention. He spent the night until Sunday morning at the police station, where he sobered up. This corresponds to the regulations for police custody, which, among other things, regulate the detention of a person to avert danger if he or she is in a helpless state, as is the case Law Forum explained.
What is police custody?
Police custody represents a significant interference with the fundamental right to freedom. It is carried out to prevent danger and does not serve to prosecute people. In Germany, the criteria and circumstances under which a person may be taken into custody are strictly regulated. According to police law, detention may only take place if there is an acute threat to public safety or in the event of self-endangerment. Preventive detention is often used in situations where someone is in a helpless state or poses a danger to themselves, such as Wikipedia summarizes.
The duration of police custody is limited to 24 hours by Section 128 Paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO), although a court order is required if additional time is needed. Care is also taken to ensure that detention is proportionate and that the personal rights of those affected are adequately protected.
In conclusion, it can be said that the police officers' decision to act in favor of protective custody in the case of the 60-year-old from Neu-Ulm was not only legally justified, but also necessary to protect him from further falls and possible injuries. Such measures are essential for public safety.