Legal trainee in Passau: Skandal around Admitted right -wing extremists!

Legal trainee in Passau: Skandal around Admitted right -wing extremists!

Passau, Deutschland - Real excitement is responsible for the news that a lawyer with a right -wing past past at the Passau district court was hired as a legal trainee. This was recently reported by the evening newspaper . Despite his connections to right -wing extremist organizations and appearances in relevant media, he is given the opportunity to take the legal trainee. The Bavarian Ministry of Justice made it clear that mere memberships in extremist groups do not automatically lead to rejection.

This decision is contrasting to an incident from 2024 when the Federal Administrative Court rejected a right -wing extremist at the Bamberg Higher Regional Court as "unsuitable". The Koblenz Higher Regional Court also emphasized that people who combat the freedom-democratic basic order are not entitled to employment as a legal clerks. The fact that these principles have now been disregarded in a specific case ensures explosive, according to the the case and the reactions

The prospective lawyer was not only a member of the right-wing schoolchildren Saxonia-Czernowitz, but also part of the Danubia fraternity observed by the constitutional protection. His commitment in the right -wing extremist scene is obvious, plus anti -Semitic conspiracy myths that he made public. This obvious belonging lets the test mechanisms of the applicant check.

In order to understand how such decisions are made, you have to take a look at the historical framework. In the 1970s, the radical decree, also known as an extremist decision, was introduced in Germany. This made it almost impossible for people who were active on the political edges to get a job in the public service. Up to 11,000 procedures were initiated, while around 3.5 million people were checked. Teachers and university teachers were also affected by these measures, such as the MDR summarized.

It remains to be seen whether this current case is seen as a step backwards in the assessment of extremism in legal training. The question arises how a fair handling of such applications can be guaranteed in the future. Above all, whether the information about the attitudes and activities of applicants is really sufficient to ensure that the basic democratic order is also respected by future lawyers.