Suche
Mein Konto
The Müller family raises allegations: the gym refuses to revoke!
A New Ulm couple is making allegations against a fitness studio after their registration was revoked for medical reasons.
The Müller family raises allegations: the gym refuses to revoke!
A newly founded family is currently facing strange problems with a fitness studio in Neu-Ulm. The Müller family, who welcomed their child four months ago, is confronted with unpleasant allegations. Nadine Müller had registered online for a fitness studio, but for medical reasons she was forced to cancel the contract within the legally stipulated 14-day cancellation period. However, the studio refused to retract and even threatened the family with consequences Augsburger Allgemeine reported.
How did this unpleasant situation come about? Gym contracts usually have a minimum contract term, and termination before this period is only possible under certain circumstances. An “important reason” is required for this, as on the website Wehner law firm is clearly explained. The right of withdrawal does not apply to contracts concluded on site, but does apply in cases where the contract was concluded online or by telephone. Under the given circumstances, Nadine Müller could have legally challenged the contract.
Legal situation clarified
But what happens when the studio gets in the way? The consumer advice center emphasizes that fitness studios are not subject to arbitrary price increases or similar contract changes without the consent of members. The possibility of extraordinary termination in the event of serious breaches of duty - for example due to a lack of staff or serious security risks - is also anchored in the law. Without these requirements, customers are bound to the contractual agreements and must fulfill their payment obligations until the end of the term, unless there are verifiable medical reasons, such as a serious illness Consumer advice center says.
Another sticking point for the Müller family is that pregnancy does not automatically lead to a special right of termination, unless significant restrictions can be proven. In this case, Nadine Müller had an understandable reason for her cancellation, but the gym disagreed and insisted on compliance with the contract.
Conclusion and outlook
This situation could have far-reaching consequences for the Müller family, especially if the gym sticks to its stance. It remains to be seen how the legal disputes will turn out and what decisions will ultimately be made. Prospective members should be aware of the rights and responsibilities that come with a gym contract to avoid unpleasant surprises.