Frenzied traffic offender: 114 km/h instead of the permitted 50 km/h in Straubing!

Frenzied traffic offender: 114 km/h instead of the permitted 50 km/h in Straubing!

Things are currently heating up in Straubing, and not just in the figurative sense! The police carried out intensive speed camera checks on Ittlinger Strasse between January 14th and 19th, 2026, and the results are more than sobering. A total of 469 road users were cited during these checks, with 171 of them receiving a report and 298 receiving a warning. What particularly catches the eye is the fastest traffic offender, who was traveling at a whopping 114 km/h, even though only 50 km/h is permitted on this section. That makes you sit up and take notice, doesn't it? The police are faced with this veritable speed frenzy with a clear goal: to increase road safety and avoid accidents, which idowa.de describes in detail.

Speed ​​monitoring is important in Germany and Austria. It is used to control the maximum permissible speed on public roads, although responsibility is regulated differently in the various federal states. In this country, it is usually the police and regional regulatory authorities who are responsible for traffic surveillance. The public order offices are responsible for surveillance within built-up areas, while the police carry out controls outside of areas. This is clearly shown by Wikipedia.

Technical details of speed monitoring

Different measurement technologies are used in speed monitoring, from radar and lasers to light barriers and video cameras. The use of radar, for example, works according to the Doppler effect and can be both stationary and mobile. In Germany, frequency bands such as Ka-band and K-band are particularly common for radar measurements. These devices also offer various measurement options, including average speed checks between two points, which are carried out using light barriers. Technology has developed tremendously over the decades, and it is exciting to see how many different systems are in use today, as described by Wikipedia.

But it's not just speeding that is in focus. Critics of speed enforcement also object that economic interests could often be at play. Revenue from fines ultimately flows into public budgets and covers the costs of monitoring. In Munich, for example, a revenue volume of 5 to 10 million euros was generated from 85,233 speeding violations within one year. This raises the exciting question: Do speed cameras really serve safety purposes or are they more of a source of income? This is also covered by Wikipedia.

Overall, the current situation in Straubing is an important indication of how seriously the authorities take compliance with speed limits. It remains to be hoped that these controls will not only lead to a profit, but will also raise awareness of road safety. Road users should be aware that such measures are not just for control purposes, but ultimately benefit all road users.