Suche
Mein Konto
Trial in Uelzen collapsed: defendant remains untraceable!
Uelzen District Court: Fraud trial collapsed, defendant did not appear - possible consequences and procedural results.
Trial in Uelzen collapsed: defendant remains untraceable!
A fraud trial recently caused a stir at the Uelzen district court. The accused man did not appear, which brought the hearing to a premature end. Interestingly, the criminal defense lawyer he hired, Marius Springer, has never seen his client, as az-online.de reports. This sheds light on the strangeness of the situation and the serious consequences facing the defendant.
Rainer Thomsen, the deputy director of the justice department, confirmed the recurring problems with defendants failing to appear at trials. Another case of the day involved a theft, in which the accused was sentenced to a prison sentence of one year and one month on probation. The defendant in the fraud case had recently moved his residence to Suderburg, but only changed his residence a month after the move. The summons to the trial therefore reached him at his old address, which calls the proper summons into question.
Unclear living situation
The information situation surrounding the defendant remains unclear. Neighbors report that his new apartment is not livable and needs to be renovated. These extraordinary circumstances lead Thomsen to express considerable doubts about the proper loading. The criminal defense attorney visited both the defendant's old and new addresses several times, but was unable to find the client.
The defendant has a criminal record not only for fraud, but also for computer fraud and is currently on probation. A new conviction could result in the revocation of that probation and a prison sentence. If the failure to appear continues to be unexplained, there is even the possibility that an arrest warrant will be issued.
Focus on litigation fraud
The issue of fraud also raises instructive questions about the duty of truth in the German legal system, as dr-schulte.de explains. Legal fraud is taken seriously in Germany and can have serious consequences. Defendants have a duty to present facts truthfully. Anyone who violates this can face prison sentences of up to five years or a fine.
If it turns out that false statements were intentionally made during the trial, those affected not only have a right to compensation, but the entire trial could also be repeated. Lawyers must pay particular attention to maintaining the obligation to tell the truth - they must not support false allegations.
This makes it clear that not only the defendant himself, but also his defense attorney bear even more responsibility in a trial. Lawyers who engage in deception also risk their license and legal consequences.
Overall, the Uelzen case shows how complex the legal framework in fraud cases can be. The course of the next few weeks will be revealing, in particular whether the defendant will face further legal action due to his absence.