Dispute over the CO pipeline: Krefeld-Uerdingen demands secure solutions!

Dispute over the CO pipeline: Krefeld-Uerdingen demands secure solutions!

In the current discussion about the controversial CO pipeline between Dormagen and Krefeld-Uerdingen, the topic has now moved to the state parliament's economic committee. How news894.de reported, the SPD has requested a report on the pipeline. This report revealed that the pipeline was supposed to be reviewed back in 2010, but this was not implemented due to ongoing legal proceedings.

The pipeline, which is around 70 kilometers long and is intended to transport toxic carbon monoxide (CO), has been completed years ago. The lack of commissioning is therefore causing discussions among residents and environmentalists. An initiative against the pipeline emphasizes the inadequate involvement of the state and the Düsseldorf district government in the current security coordination and calls for more pressure to act from both sides.

Litigation and Lawsuits

Opposition to the project is backed by a legal dispute. How rp-online.de reported that four private individuals from Monheim and Leichlingen are suing against the construction and operation of the pipeline. These plaintiffs not only have their own concerns, but also have the support of tens of thousands who also oppose the project. The plaintiffs' greatest concern is the dangers that odorless and toxic carbon monoxide can pose if a pipe rupture occurs.

Particular emphasis is also placed on the inadequate safety measures and the controversial route, which could have been influenced by influencers from Meerbusch. The legal dispute is taking on a new dimension as the Higher Administrative Court in Münster has scheduled an oral hearing in the appeal proceedings on August 19 and 20, 2023. The location, the auditorium of the Prince-Bishop's Palace, was chosen to ensure health protection during the corona pandemic.

Approval process and future of the pipeline

The pipeline, which is intended to connect chemical parks in Krefeld-Uerdingen and Dormagen, was approved by the Düsseldorf district government's planning approval decision in February 2007. But the situation remains complex: six years ago, the proceedings were suspended by the Higher Administrative Court, and the Federal Constitutional Court declared the submission inadmissible in December 2016. The appeal decision has currently been postponed due to a plan change procedure. At the request of Covestro AG, the Düsseldorf district government has also issued a decision for the immediate completion of the pipeline construction, which seems to further increase the situation.

Amid these legal battles, the pipeline remains a hot potato. The topic not only creates captivating discussions in the state parliament, but also among the population, who are concerned about their safety and the environment.