Acquittal for former doctor: case of a fatal morphine drama!

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

In the trial at the Regensburg regional court, the acquittal demand for an ex-doctor for the possible murder of a patient is being discussed.

Im Prozess am Landgericht Regensburg wird die Freispruchforderung für einen Ex-Arzt wegen möglichem Mord an einem Patienten diskutiert.
In the trial at the Regensburg regional court, the acquittal demand for an ex-doctor for the possible murder of a patient is being discussed.

Acquittal for former doctor: case of a fatal morphine drama!

In Regensburg, a trial surrounding the death of a patient at Kelheim Hospital is causing a stir. The former senior doctor who is accused of murdering a 79-year-old patient by overdosing on morphine could soon be acquitted. He shares this BR with. The public prosecutor's office recently requested that the doctor be acquitted because they believe palliative medical treatment was justified.

Although the prosecutor expressed doubts about the doctor's innocence, he was not convinced of his guilt. He pointed out that the reasons for the defendant's change in therapy were incomprehensible and that the patient's cause of death remained unclear due to the lack of an autopsy and toxicological report. The defense, however, emphasizes that the dose of morphine was administered according to medical standards and that there was no intent to kill.

The role of morphine in palliative care

Morphine is used in the dying phase to relieve pain and improve quality of life. The Frankfurter Abendblatt emphasizes that morphine has a direct effect on the central nervous system and the dosage must always be adjusted individually. Side effects may include nausea, constipation and respiratory depression. The risk of dependency is lower in palliative care, but it must also be taken into account.

The family of the deceased also emphasized that the psychological stress and uncertainties that resulted from the situation were enormous. Communication within the clinical team in particular was critically questioned. Some hospital employees exercised their right to refuse to testify, which did not make the case easier to resolve.

Medical care in focus

During the ongoing trial, there are repeated arguments between the medical experts. The defense criticizes the inadequate documentation of the treatments, while the co-plaintiff's lawyer points to procedural deficits and poor internal communication. The verdict in this complex matter is expected on July 30th.

In critical situations, not only care at home is important, but also access to medical repatriation. A Express service for medical repatriations is essential for intensive care patients abroad. This service guarantees rapid repatriation to German hospitals, with an experienced team of doctors accompanying the patients during the transport.

The combination of these medical aspects and the legal tests gives an idea of ​​the responsibility that rests on the shoulders of doctors. This is not just about medical standards, but also about ethical considerations and responsibility towards the patients' relatives, who are often faced with insoluble challenges in these difficult times.