Escape from court: Defendant breaks policewoman's finger!
A convicted fraudster fled during his trial in the Alsfeld district court. He injured a policewoman.

Escape from court: Defendant breaks policewoman's finger!
A special kind of excitement took place in the Alsfeld district court on April 16, 2024, when an already convicted defendant made a spectacular attempt to escape during his trial. The 39-year-old, who was standing trial for fraud, breach of trust and forgery, fled immediately after the verdict was announced, which led to a dramatic incident. The judge gave him a sentence of three years and three months in prison, but that didn't stop him from losing his temper as he left the courtroom. The Lauterbacher Anzeiger reports an initial outcry when the defendant begged not to be taken into custody immediately and then stormed the building.
The situation came to a head when a police officer tried to stop the escapee. In a scuffle that developed outside the court, the defendant broke the policewoman's finger. More specifically, a fracture of the left ring finger was diagnosed, supplemented by a dislocation of the little finger and a hairline crack in the fifth metacarpal. Despite his aggressive attitude, the fugitive was eventually brought down and overpowered by other police officers during his short trip outside, reports FFH.
Judicial aftermath
The lay judges' court in Alsfeld convicted the man not only for his escape, but also for physically attacking law enforcement officers and resisting state authority. This also earned him a prison sentence of one year without parole. Presiding judge Britta Jansen-Matthies was shocked by the vehemence of the defendant's actions. After his arrest, the convicted man is now behind bars and has appealed the verdict. However, his escape and the associated use of violence also raise questions about security standards in German courts.
Interestingly, in many cases escaping from custody is not a criminal offense in Germany as long as no further offenses are committed, as noted at NADR. This raises the question of what structural security deficiencies exist in the courthouses. This problem is particularly evident in a number of similar incidents in recent years, which show that the safety standards and structural condition in many facilities leave something to be desired.
In this particular case, the injury to the police officer is another serious signal of the need to invest more in security technology and employee acquisition. The experiences in the Alsfeld court are likely to be a wake-up call not only for those directly involved, but for the entire judiciary. The bill for such a high-profile incident remains concern for the safety of officers and the proper conduct of legal proceedings, an issue that is increasingly coming to the forefront of public discussion.