Conflict escalates: Israel bombies Iran's nuclear goals, what now?

Conflict escalates: Israel bombies Iran's nuclear goals, what now?

The conflict between Israel and Iran has experienced a worrying escalation in the past few days. On Friday, June 13, 2025, Israel carried out extensive attacks on Iranian goals, including nuclear facilities and facilities of the revolutionary guards. This was the first large -scale attack within Iranian limits. The attacks called “Preventive Schlag” by Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz aim to neutralize a supposed “immediate and existential threat” for Israel. President Izchak Herzog referred to the increasingly threatening nuclear capacities of Iran, which represented a serious danger az-online.de.

The reaction of Tehrans to this aggression was not long in coming. On the night of Monday, June 16, Iran started attacks with hyperschallrakets on Israel. At the same time, Israel continued to bomb military and atomic facilities in Iran. Several high -ranking commanders from the Air Force and leading nuclear researchers were killed in the Israeli attacks. Even if the Israeli population predominantly supports the attacks, the killing of scientists who work on the Iranian nuclear program raises high -grade international law issues. Experts such as international lawyers Dominik Steiger argue that a preventive impact is only permitted if there is a direct threat. In this opinion, the risk of an Iranian attack was too abstract to be justified, according to the ZDF.

A new international law to be defined?

The serious situation was illuminated by experts like Michael Wolffsohn, who emphasizes in an analysis that a military defeat of Iran could lead to domestic changes. However, this hope is opposed to existing international law, which in this conflict does not clearly apply. The politician and conflict expert Claudia Baumgart-Ox describes Iran as a serious threat, especially because of the threats of extermination and the support of terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hisbollah. These acting factors question the stability in the region and fuel the risk of further escalations. She sees the Israeli attacks as non-international law, since there has not been a direct Iranian attack on Israel, as [watson.de] (https://politik.watson.de/politik/analyse/804913649-israel-und-iran-experten-zu-voelkelklecht-atomstreit-und-und-und-und-und-und-und-und-und- and

The international community has the situation with great concern. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in particular is alerted by the progress in the Iranian nuclear program. Thorsten Bonacker from the University of Marburg warns that the escalation endangers the possibility of a nuclear agreement and believes that a threatening surface fire in the region is unlikely as long as the allies of Iran like Russia and China do not actively intervene.

If the conflict is further exhilarating, this could lead to serious effects on the world order. According to Wolffsohn, international law must be adapted to guarantee states the right to self -defense. The current geopolitical tensions also highlight the deficits of international agreements and the difficulties associated with the maintenance of peace in such a complex region.

The location remains tense and it remains to be seen whether diplomatic conversations can be taken to de -escalate violence and find a peaceful solution. While Israel continues his strategy, the attitude of the United States and international actors could be decisive to prevent further misfortune.